<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jack Daniel&#8217;s Old No. 7 Whiskey review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review</link>
	<description>WhiskyRant! has whisky reviews with movie references from whisky and film enthusiast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Johannes Lindblom		</title>
		<link>https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/#comment-31955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johannes Lindblom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.whiskyrant.com/?p=4244#comment-31955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/#comment-31615&quot;&gt;Tracy B.&lt;/a&gt;.

I won&#039;t disagree with you here. Jack Daniel&#039;s has found a way to stand out, even if it&#039;s just a small nuance of differentiation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/#comment-31615">Tracy B.</a>.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t disagree with you here. Jack Daniel&#8217;s has found a way to stand out, even if it&#8217;s just a small nuance of differentiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracy B.		</title>
		<link>https://www.whiskyrant.com/jack-daniels-old-no7-whiskey-review/#comment-31615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 03:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.whiskyrant.com/?p=4244#comment-31615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Not a bourbon!&quot; -- I don&#039;t care if they market it as a bourbon or if they want their own cute little designation; it&#039;s a bourbon. It&#039;s a bourbon that is charcoal filtered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not a bourbon!&#8221; &#8212; I don&#8217;t care if they market it as a bourbon or if they want their own cute little designation; it&#8217;s a bourbon. It&#8217;s a bourbon that is charcoal filtered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.whiskyrant.com @ 2026-07-26 07:12:37 by W3 Total Cache
-->